Energy efficient bulbs should be handled with extreme caution

January 20th, 2009 by Kurt Niland

cfl bulb 150x150Energy efficiency is a great way to save money and help the planet at the same time, and replacing all your old incandescent light bulbs with compact fluorescent lights (CFLs) is a great place to start conserving energy. CFL bulbs, however, contain varying degrees of the toxic metal mercury, and should be handled with extreme caution. CFL bulbs are perfectly safe to use, but every precaution should be taken to make sure the bulbs do no break.

I spent a couple hours last week replacing most of the incandescent bulbs in my vacation home with CFLs. I had seen a report about them on the news well over a year ago and have been gradually replacing the bulbs at home with CFLs as they burn out. Last night, in fact, I replaced the eight bulbs in the dining room chandelier with CFL bulbs only to discover that they do not work on a dimmer switch. Had I read the small print on the box, I would have avoided that mistake.

But there are more important things missing from the small print on the boxes of CFL bulbs that I bought. This morning, a friend coincidentally emailed me an announcement by the Energy Working Group, which listed steps to take when a CFL bulb breaks. I had no idea.

For the most part, you have to treat the incident like a biohazard event by donning a makeshift safe suit, clearing and cleaning the area, and isolating the broken bulb in a sealed glass container. A broken CFL bulb releases fine particles of mercury, a potent neurotoxin, which is a dangerous substance even in minute quantities.

The particular box of CFL bulbs I bought does not say how much mercury the bulbs contain and what to do in the event that one breaks. The only warning on the box and the bulbs themselves concerns electric shock. So it seems that just as the worries that adequate warnings might scare people away from some pharmaceutical drugs, the EPA worries warnings and information on the packaging of CFL bulbs might be bad for business, too.

The bulbs that I bought do carry the Environmental Protection Agency’s Energy Star logo, which means by law they must contain no more than 5 mg mercury, which is the government’s Energy Star standard. But even that standard is considered too high in the European Union and, surprisingly, by the bulb manufacturers themselves. These days, CFL bulbs have an average mercury content of about 3.5 mg. In the E.U., mercury content is capped at 4 mg.

To be fair, I went back to the store and looked at other brands. Some packages say “lamp contains mercury” and “Manage in Accord with Disposal Laws,” but other than that, the toxic nature of these bulbs when broken is invisible.

For more information about CFL bulbs, go to http://www.ewg.org/node/27220

  • Karen Nardella
    Good morning,

    I am writing to implore Americans to wake up! I have been asking and as yet nobody seems to care about CFL's and the danger they are set to pose to our world. So I have updated information and thank you for reading this. I still will continue to work to get this INSANE CFL bulb law reversed.

    I thought for sure Congressman Poe might have been, but I was mistaken. I have written his writer, have not recieved a response. I am beginning to think it was a smoke and pony show for comedy relief on the house floor. I have begun a group to gain support to this end. This law must be reversed. It is not an option.

    Simple math:

    2008: An estimated 300 million bulbs bought in America. Each Bulb contains 5mg of extremely dangerous Mercury.

    With this small amount of purchases, compared to where that number will grow, I believe you will see the answer is simply outrageous. WAL_MART is excited to plan on selling 100 MILLION of these bulbs this year. These numbers are mere guesses as to what the real number of sales are IN THE WORLD are is any ones guess. A law? If CFL's were sooooo good we would not have needed an 882 page Law and the EPA would not have had to write a 3 page single spaced document regarding the uses and disposal of the same. We would not be scrambling to open haz waste disposal facilities for the same. I ask, where is intelligents today. Was it all used up in he times of our founders? This law was and is sheer lunacy.

    This massive amount of Mercury is posed for our landfills and then into our water. The government and the EPA stance that the energy saving is worth the danger is ludicrous. There are many ways to save energy as well as lower emissions rather than this bulb law.

    Indulge my little rant here: Last I read this government was of the people, by the people and for the people. The government has grossly overshot their position on this matter. I know it is not the first time, but as for me, I am tired of letting them get away with whatever they want at the people's expense. Most people have thrown their hands in the air and allow the government to do as they please, and to this end we find ourselves in the positions we are today.

    I aim to see this law REVERSED. I am looking to connect with anyone who feels the same. Congress passed this ridiculous law in darkness without informing the people. People had no knowledge of it, so therefore could not make an informed decision and or approve it. People are in the dark to the dangers these bulbs pose for us, our children (both born and unborn), our homes, landfills and our planet.

    Look in any Chemical Handbook and you will be enlightened about the Dangers of Mercury - there is a reason it is handled with Iron Flasks. This law is sheer lunacy.

    I know this was long and I am sorry to take your time, but as you may sense, I am passionate about the reversal of this law. How do you feel about it? If you read this far, I thank you. It is more important than anyone might realize.

    Best to you,
    Karen Nardella
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.